BP oil spil Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

BP embrocate spil - Essay ExampleThe unfavorable generality caused by the oil color spill caused BP corporate takes to plummet, and this was made worse by President Obamas public condemnation of the confederation. The company CEO Tony Hayward was largely criticized and blamed for the incident. He subsequently stepped down from his set up several calendar months after the oil spill. Based on the above situation, this paper shall now assess the public relations (PR) implications of the oil spill on BP. It shall also evaluate whether the organization could have handled the situation check and if it could have, its different actions in this regard. The main issues of the event shall be presented, along with the individuals and state affected by this oil spill. This paper shall evaluate how BP handled this disaster. A fair and balanced discussion shall be undertaken for this issue, mainly presenting the companys side as well as the publics side on this issue. After presenting two sides of the issue, this students position and judgment shall also be presented. This paper is being undertaken in the forecast of establishing a comprehensive and academic discussion on the subject matter. Discussion PR implications for BP The PR implications of the oil disaster for BP present a negative ambit of the company. In fact, with just a few language exhalationd to the press, it seems to negate its mantra, BP cares. The way BP handled the disaster in terms of public relations did not help the company in any way and their PR efforts did not portray BP in the best of light. It even visualised them as an uncaring and incompetent company (Berr, 2010). Before the US Congress Hearing, Tony Hayward repeatedly blamed others for the disaster and he, in behalf of the company, hardly took any responsibility for the disaster and for the decisions the company made which led to the explosion. A month after the explosion, BP claimed that the environmental impact of the oil spill wo uld be very, very modest. In the agile aftermath, and now months after the initial oil spill, its impact to the environment has already proven to be massive (Hutchison, 2010). In fact, its impact is set to last for many more years to come. BP also did not release accurate statistics and reports to the public. Furthermore, it first admitted that it has underestimated the amount of oil which was leaking. It was unable to express how much was spilling, but estimates it at some 5,000 barrels. The White House negated this figure by expressing that it was closer to 60,000 barrels (Hutchison, 2010). In the aftermath of the disaster, BPs share prices fell by about four percent. This was the same day when the US accused BP of downplaying the impact of the spill. cardinal months into the oil spill, it was revealed that BP was given permission to drill in the Gulf of Mexico after it presented documents which basically expressed that it was capable of dealing with oil spills even larger th an the one it was facing (Hutchison, 2010). These revelations provided more sources of embarrassment for the company. Tony Hayward was criticized for his insensitivity when he later remarked that he would like his life back. Even if he apologized for his comment, the damage to BPs image was already done. BP was wiped off 12bn pounds on the day that Barack Obama declared that he was now launching a immoral investigation of BP